Race Issues in
America
What
President Bush could have said to the NAACP
by Michael
Zak
http://www.republicanbasics.com/
Addressing the
NAACP’s annual meeting, President Bush made good progress in reaching out to
African- American voters. The warm reception from the audience must have worried
Democrats who consider themselves owners of the African-American vote. Even more
important, however, than how the NAACP views the Republican Party is how the
Republican Party views itself.
As Republicans
embrace their heritage as “the party of Lincoln,” they will understand the true
heritage of the Democrats to be “the party of slavery” and “the party of the
Confederacy” and the party of the Ku Klux Klan.”
Laudable as his
remarks were, President Bush talked about “the Civil Rights movement” as if
there had only been one. In fact, the achievements of heroes such as Martin
Luther King and Thurgood Marshall constituted our nation’s second civil rights
movement. The first was a century before, when the Republican Party, smashing
past obstacles thrown up by the Democrats, enacted a series of civil rights
laws. What made a second civil rights movement necessary in the 1950s and 1960s
was that Democrats had defeated the first civil rights movement back in the
1860’s and 1870s. Tragically, Democrats succeeded in postponing Lincoln’s “new
birth of freedom.”
Once most
Democrats in Congress walked out to join the Confederacy, Republicans were able
to enact their civil rights agenda. With not one congressional Democrat voting
in favor, in 1862 Republicans banned slavery in the territories and in the
District of Columbia. With not one Democrat voting in favor, in 1865 the
Republicans passed the 13th Amendment banning slavery. They then had to override
Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto to enact the 1866 Civil Rights Act,
which declared African- Americans to be citizens and with equal rights. Again,
not one Democrat in Congress voted for it. To prevent the Democrats from ever
repealing the 1866 Civil Rights Act, Republicans codified its principles into
the Constitution, as the 14th Amendment. Once again, not a single Democrat in
Congress voted for it.
Today, even most
Republicans do not know that the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Act
were revised versions of Republican initiatives during the first civil rights
movement. The Republicans’ 1875 Civil Rights Act banned racial discrimination in
private as well as public accommodations for eight years before being struck
down by the Supreme Court. To get around that 1883 decision is why the 1964 law
was based on the interstate commerce clause rather than the 14th Amendment. The
1965 Voting Rights Act is not the law which guaranteed African- Americans the
right to vote. The Republican Party had already accomplished that with the 15th
Amendment, which unscrupulous Democrats throughout the South had learned to
evade with literacy tests, poll taxes, and other schemes.
President Bush
listed many horrors that African- Americans had to overcome, but left unstated
who the villains were. The Jim Crow laws mentioned by President Bush? They were
enacted by Democrat- controlled state legislatures. And the men who held the
leashes of those police dogs and the nooses of those lynch mobs? Democrats, all
of them.
The Republican
Party should stop throwing away political capital, because the more we
Republicans know about the history of our Party, the more the Democrats will
worry about the future of theirs.
Michael Zak’s
article is adapted from his book
Back to Basics for the Republican Party, a history of the GOP from the
civil rights perspective. His e-mail address is Grand_Old_Partisan@hotmail.com.
Contact Michael
Zak (Grand_Old_Partisan@hotmail.com) to invite him to speak at Lincoln/Reagan
dinners, conventions, and other Republican events. For more information, see:
www.republicanbasics.com
|
|
By Larry Elder
From the Daily Breeze
The "funeral" of Coretta Scott King turned into an
ugly, disrespectful political rally.
Rev. Joseph Lowery, co-founder -- along with Martin
Luther King Jr. -- of the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference, castigated President Bush for insufficient disaster
relief, failing to provide health care and failing to cure
poverty. "We know now there were no weapons of mass destruction
over there," said Lowery. "But Coretta knew and we know that there
are weapons of misdirection right down here. Millions without
health insurance. Poverty abounds. For war, billions more, but no
more for the poor."
Listening to speaker after speaker complain about
the poor conditions under which minorities live, one wonders
whether Martin Luther King Jr. accomplished anything.
There stood Oprah Winfrey, the most powerful woman
in television, with her net worth estimated by Forbes magazine at
$1.3 billion. And she recently signed a $55 million deal with XM
Satellite Radio. There stood poet Maya Angelou, who, in one recent
year, grossed $3.3 million according to Forbes, and lives in a
mansion while employing several people full time. There stood
Shirley Franklin, the black female mayor of the city of Atlanta.
There stood former presidential candidate Rev. Al Sharpton, a man
who once called Jews "diamond merchants" and denounced a white
Harlem storeowner as a "white interloper." And, of course, Jesse
Jackson spoke -- a multimillionaire with two sons who own an
Anheuser-Busch beer distributorship, and another son who serves as
a U.S. congressman from the Chicago area.
Bernice King, one of Martin Luther and Coretta
Scott King's daughters, gave the eulogy. Did she really complain
about "materialism"? For the King family members -- if the sale at
Sotheby's goes through -- may net $30 million for their father's
papers. The family also owns copyrights on many of MLK's speeches,
including the "I Have a Dream" speech. The Kings sued CBS for
airing part of the "I Have a Dream" speech and sued USA Today for
reprinting the speech's text. CBS ultimately settled the lawsuit
by making a donation to the King Center, and USA Today had to
issue an apology along with its settlement.
Most blacks are middle class and do not live in the
inner city. If black America were a separate country, its GDP
would place it at No. 16 in the world. Corporations like Time
Warner, American Express and Merrill Lynch all have black CEOs.
America, while not perfect, certainly has come a
long, long way since the day King led the Montgomery bus boycott.
But the funeral speakers confuse equal rights with equal results
-- two very different things. UCLA public policy professor
emeritus James Q. Wilson once said, "You need only do three things
to avoid poverty in this country: finish high school, marry before
having a child, and produce the child after the age of 20. Only 8
percent of families who do this are poor; 79 percent of those who
fail to do this are poor." Yet today's "black leaders" demand
reparations, set-asides, race-based preferences, and still more
welfare.
In 1911, Booker T. Washington seemed to address
some of those who spoke at the funeral when he said, "There is (a)
class of colored people who make a business of keeping the
troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before
the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out
of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of
advertising their wrongs -- partly because they want sympathy, and
partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro
to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their
jobs. ... There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who
don't want the patient to get well, because as long as the disease
holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but
also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent
before the public."
Larry Elder is an attorney, syndicated columnist
and national radio talk-show host. He can be heard from 3 to 6
p.m. Monday through Friday on KABC-AM 790. His e-mail address is
sage@larryelder.com.
|
From the Boston Globe, August 22, 2005

Adam Hunter of Somerset, N.J., helped revive the College
Republicans group at Howard University. (Getty Images Photo) |
More young blacks ready to embrace GOP
Some cast aside traditional loyalties
By Kaitlin Bell, Globe Correspondent |
August 22, 2005
WASHINGTON -- Adam Hunter, an ambitious law student with bright
eyes, an easy smile, and plenty of charisma, seems practically
destined for politics.
A half century ago, his grandfather helped register blacks living
in rural South Carolina to vote. Hunter's father, born on a tobacco
farm and taught in segregated schools, was inspired by the civil
rights movement to join the Democratic Party. His parents have both
headed the local Democratic committee in their New Jersey town, and
Hunter himself worked as a campaign volunteer before he was old
enough to vote.
Hunter, 22, is a first-year law student at Howard University, a
historically black campus with a long record of liberal activism. He
has political ambitions of his own -- but not with the Democrats.
Instead, Hunter, who as an undergraduate headed Howard's chapter
of College Republicans, sees himself as part of a younger generation
of African-Americans. He is ready to cast aside traditional
loyalties to the Democratic Party and forge his own political
identity.
''My father and I are not that different, ideologically, but if
you look at the time period we grew up in, that's where we're
different," Hunter said. ''My foundation doesn't make me
beholden to the Democratic Party. To me there's nothing more
undemocratic than the idea that you have to vote for a Democrat or
don't vote at all come Election Day."
Hunter is one of a growing number of young African-Americans
leaving the party of their parents and grandparents in favor of the
GOP -- or choosing not to have a political affiliation at all.
A July Gallup Poll of minorities' political opinions indicated
that black voters overwhelmingly favor the Democratic Party, and the
percentage of African-Americans who consider themselves Republicans
lingers at about 9 percent. However, according to the poll, of those
blacks who vote GOP, most are under age 50 -- a generational shift
that could be an opportunity for Republicans and a headache for
Democrats.
Democrats have had a decades-long hammerlock on the black vote,
stemming largely from the civil rights battles of the 1960s. Senator
John F. Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, received an estimated 88
percent of the African-American vote in 2004, 2 percent less than Al
Gore won in 2000, according to exit polls.
Jeffrey M. Jones, who conducted the Gallup Poll, said it is too
early to tell whether a slight increase in young black voters
identifying with the Republican Party represents a long-term trend.
But if those numbers rise another 5 or 10 percent next year, people
should take note.
''There's a lot of hints out there that something is going
on," he said. ''Nothing is totally conclusive, but the more
hints there are out there, the more evidence you have that this
could be real."
However, Republicans, billing themselves as ''the party of
Lincoln," have launched a high-profile campaign to chip away at what
has been a reliable voting block for Democrats. While older black voters
still have strong attachments to the Democratic party, political
specialists say, younger African-Americans are less likely to be bound by
tradition: They grew up in an integrated society, they don't have personal
memories of the civil rights movement, and they are more focused on
entrepreneurship and opportunity, two of the GOP's selling points.
''The question people are going to have is, who wants to build on the
civil right movement's success -- closing the wealth gap, closing the
health gap, offering people real access to opportunity?" Ken Mehlman,
chairman of the Republican National Committee, said in an interview.
He reiterated his pitch to black voters: ''Give us a chance, and we'll
give you a choice."
Hunter said he's well aware of the Democratic Party's history of
helping minorities; he doesn't think that means they deserve his vote 40
years after key civil rights battles. Other issues are more important to
him, he says: privatizing Social Security, lowering taxes, and business
development. ''I strongly believe that there should be options for
Americans -- rich, poor, old, young -- to invest," he said.
As some black voters drift toward the GOP, Republicans have accused the
Democratic Party of expedient politics: ignoring a core constituency until
it's time to vote, rather than nurturing African-Americans between
elections. Some African-American Democrats share that complaint.
''I think there's an extreme danger" of losing black votes to the
GOP, said Lamell McMorris, an African-American political consultant who
heads the Washington-based Perennial Strategies. Democrats are still
relying on their civil rights record and are not pitching new ideas to
young, professional blacks seeking to build businesses and personal
wealth.
''As time goes on, you're dealing with a generation of individuals who,
in their mind, are very far removed from the civil rights movement,"
said McMorris, who is 32. ''You cannot keep going on this romanticized,
ideological civil rights agenda and think you can reach out to
African-Americans of my generation.' "
''What the Democrats have not been able to do is to come up with a new
vision, a new voice, a new perspective, a way to reach out to younger
members of the African-American community," he said. ''In that area,
I think the Republicans have done a better job."
Hunter said he's been inspired by the Republican Party's efforts to
reach out to black voters. He praised Mehlman, noting that the RNC
chairman accepted the chapter's invitation to speak at Howard last spring.
It was one of 17 appearances Mehlman has made around the country to
recruit black voters. A GOP spokeswoman said Mehlman has held monthly
strategy sessions with a group of prominent African-Americans and is
seeking to recruit more black candidates for elected office.
But at Howard, where allegiances to Democrats run deep, recruiting
Republicans took some work, Hunter said.
During his freshman year, Hunter said, he resurrected Howard's chapter
of College Republicans, which had been dormant for more than a decade,
with hopes of injecting some political diversity into campus discourse.
About 60 or 70 students signed up for the group, he said, but only about
10 or 15 were committed members.
Although Hunter has considered himself a Republican since junior high
school and had worked on GOP campaigns before graduating high school, he
said not all Howard students were as eager to wear their political
affiliation on their sleeves.
''On a black campus, it's hard to find people to stand up and say, one,
I'm Republican, and two, I'm ready to go out and lead other
students," Hunter said. But he noted that Howard's administration
supported him by sponsoring debates with other campus political groups.
Some administrators and professors said privately that they shared his
political views.
Mehlman acknowledged that it will be difficult to tap into the
Democrats' most reliable constituency. But he noted that in close
elections, even a few percentage points can make a difference. Republicans
doubled their support among African-American voters last year in Ohio -- a
critical battleground Bush won by 2 percentage points -- and nearly
doubled support among black voters in Michigan, Mehlman said.
Hunter's own future in the Republican Party may come later; right now,
he's focused on law school and plans to become a corporate lawyer.
Eventually, he hopes to return to New Jersey, he said, and run for
governor or the US Senate. But it will take more than a few young people
like himself for the GOP to truly make a difference.
''The Republican Party needs to work hard to understand the issues that
are important to the community," he said. ''Funding higher education,
home ownership, African famine, genocide, AIDS -- there's still a lot of
work to be done."
|